top of page
logo-impactworks.png

The most frequent message after the Big Three Pharma CX report went live?

  • Writer: Christian Schulze
    Christian Schulze
  • Jun 9
  • 2 min read

"Great framework. But what about [vendor name]?"


I got that question dozens of times. From CDOs, commercial leads, even vendors themselves.


Adobe, Salesforce, and Veeva dominate pharma CX conversations. But the Big Three report proved what many suspected: no single vendor scores above 4.0 across all five dimensions. If your CX architecture inevitably involves multiple platforms (and it will), evaluating only the obvious three is like grading a group project by checking three students and assuming the rest don't matter.


So I did what the community asked.


Same framework. Same 5 dimensions. Same 31 sub-criteria. Same scoring methodology (1 to 5, evidence-based, verified against 48+ sources). Applied to 10 vendors that most pharma organizations have never benchmarked side by side.


The five that scored highest in the assessment:


๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ

๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ

๐—›๐˜†๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ (๐—Ÿ๐˜†๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ผ)

๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ

๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—œ๐—ค + ๐—”๐—ธ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ


(Listed alphabetically. Scores and rankings are for the full report.)


What I can share already:


๐Ÿญ. ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ถ๐—ด ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€.

Not marginally. Decisively.


๐Ÿฎ. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ "๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ" ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด.

Several of these platforms run enterprise-scale operations at top-20 pharma companies right now. Calling them niche is comfortable, not accurate.


๐Ÿฏ. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—–๐—ซ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜.

The Big Three report hinted at this. The holistic assessment makes it undeniable.


๐Ÿฐ. ๐—”๐—œ ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป.

If those are your gaps, the Big Three might not be your answer.


A word on the Big Three report: it has been downloaded far beyond what I expected, and the feedback has been outstanding. Based on input from the community and from vendors directly, an updated version with refined scores and additional evidence is coming.


The holistic platforms report drops soon, covering these five and five additional vendors. After that: more vendors, more waves, a growing landscape to help you select across all five dimensions.


My 9-year-old saw the spreadsheet and asked why some cells are red and some are green. I told her green means a company is good at something and red means they are not. She said: "So nobody is all green?" Correct. Welcome to enterprise software.


If you are making CX platform decisions in 2026 or 2027, don't commit before you see the full landscape.


Follow along for the release. And if you need help designing a vendor evaluation that spans all five CX dimensions, that is exactly what we do at ImpactWorks.


Comments


bottom of page